Showing posts with label Social in Burma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social in Burma. Show all posts

Friday, September 21, 2012

Suu Kyi to young people: Don’t ‘just sit in front of the ’net.’

Young peace advocates no longer had to imagine Aung San Suu Kyi behind the closed doors of house arrest. The Nobel laureate was in Washington this week to receive the Congressional Gold Medal from the president, and she stopped by the Newseum on Thursday for an interactive question-and-answer session with high school and college students.
Democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, center with scarf, answers questions from student during an Amnesty International event at the Newseum on Sept. 20, 2012, in Washington. (Bill O'Leary - The Washington Post)

She cautiously took the stage in her slate-blue traditional Burmese dress and spoke with a restrained steeliness about the pursuit of peace against despotic governments and open communication across cultural borders. She began her speech saying she arrived to “pass the torch” of peace advocacy to the younger generation, who will “uncover the root cause” of political oppression.
“The seed of hatred is fear,” Suu Kyi said. “It is fear that leads to dislike and hatred. What the young people must do is try to eradicate fear."
Suu Kyi received thousands of submitted questions online, as a testament to her growing icon status. She weaved in practical advice amid her talk about the virtues of nonviolence in the political arena.
“When something troubles me, I think to myself, after 24 hours, this will seem less serious.”
She also encouraged young people to read and “not just sit in front of the ’net.”
One audience member asked about her personal sacrifice and touched upon her 24-plus-year struggle to work with the Burmese military junta. In 1990, Burmese authorities refused to recognize the parliamentary election victory of Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy political party and rejected her appeal for a civilian-led government. On a personal level, Suu Kyi was subjected to house arrest and unable to see her family, including her now-deceased husband, for years.
“My fight was long, but not lonely because of people like you fighting for me,” she said. “I have to say that I’ve never thought that I was making any kind of sacrifice. I always thought I was following a path that I chose.”
Through the years, Suu Kyi has remained steadfast in what she said is a request for “funding, advice and engagement” from the U.S. government to help Burma build democratic institutions.
 “We have lived under dictatorship for half a century, and getting out of a particular mind-set is not easy.... We look to the U.S. [as an example], as they have always been a champion of democracy.”
Audience members also asked Suu Kyi to connect her struggle for democracy to current conflicts, including the Arab Spring uprisings.
“I do not understand people who believe violence is a legitimate way to human rights,” she replied. “You are undermining the foundation of human rights. You should do it through your ability to resist violence at every stage of the way.”
Pyotr Verzilov, the husband of Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, one of the arrested members of Russian punk rock band Pussy Riot, and his daughter Gera presented the democracy leader with flowers. Verzilov was in town to meet with U.S. lawmakers in support of sanctions on Russian officials.
“I don't see why people should not sing whatever they want to sing” — unless they can’t carry a tune, Suu Kyi deadpanned, drawing laughter from the crowd.
“I hope the whole [Pussy Riot] group will be released as soon as possible,” she said on a more serious note.
“Was there anything in their song that was nasty to other people? Yes, individual people can take offense, but the [government] cannot. The government doesn’t count as people. [It] must be prepared to take criticism. Governments who can’t take criticism will never turn out to be good governments.”

Links :: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/suukyi-to-young-people-dont-just-sit-in-front-of-the-net/2012/09/21/5c970228-03f5-11e2-9b24-ff730c7f6312_blog.html?wprss=rss_world

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

The Thieves of Burma

Hello from the third-most corrupt place on Earth.

BY CHRISTIAN CARYL | MARCH 27, 2012

YANGON - This week I'm in Burma, where Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi is running for a seat in parliament. This is the first time she's been allowed to participate in an election in 22 years. The last one, in 1990, brought a landslide victory to her National League for Democracy (NLD). But she wasn't really in a position to enjoy it. As the results came in she was already under house arrest, and many of her colleagues had disappeared into prison.

If she makes it into parliament this time around, she will have little formal power to affect the passage of legislation. Even if the NLD wins all the seats up for grabs, its presence in parliament will still be dwarfed by that of the military, which has controlled the country's political system for the past 50 years and is automatically assured a large bloc of seats in the assembly.

Yet no one should underestimate The Lady, as many refer to her here. As the only politician in the country to enjoy genuine adulation, Aung San Suu Kyi is sure to give her party a disproportionately loud voice, and in politics that can count for quite a lot. As the de facto leader of the opposition, she will be able to turn a spotlight on issues that the country's military rulers have long preferred to leave in the shadows.

She should start with an issue that holds a prominent place in the lives of her compatriots: corruption. Burma is one of the most corrupt countries in the world, which is saying a lot. In the most recent Corruption Perceptions Index published by the watchdog group Transparency International, Burma's rank was 180. The only countries that ranked worse were Somalia and North Korea.

This will not come as news to Aung San Suu Kyi's voters. They encounter petty bribery on an everyday basis, but the culture of sleaze here goes way beyond that. For decades, Burma's military leaders divided up this country's astonishing national wealth among themselves, reducing the rest of their compatriots to poverty. On YouTube you can watch a leaked video of the wedding of the daughter of top general Than Shwe (pictured above, and covered in jewels). If you want to pay your respects to someone powerful in Burma, the best way to do so is by giving him or her a car as a present. Rumor has it that the gifts received by the happy couple in the video included 70 sets of car keys.

This is hardly a trivial problem. Burma desperately needs foreign direct investment to jumpstart economic growth and spur the influx of modern management and technological know-how, but investors are likely to shy away if the country can't clean up its act. Why put money into a factory -- or an English-language newspaper, for that matter -- if some politically well-connected thug can come along at the right moment and scoop up your property? Especially when you know that you'll have little chance of redress, since the legal system is also deeply permeated by sleaze.

So malfeasance is a big problem. But there's another reason why Aung San Suu Kyi should make it a priority. Her real power to change things may be limited, but corruption is one area where a bit of sunlight can have a disproportionate effect. If she succeeds in winning a seat, one of the first things she should do upon entering parliament is to propose a public code of conduct for all government officials. She should push for transparency in the administration of all state-owned assets, including clear rules on procurement and the awarding of government contracts.

She should also declare her interest in setting up an anti-corruption commission modeled on the existing bodies in Hong Kong or Singapore. Both places are famous for giving their corruption-fighting ombudsmen broad powers to investigate and prosecute graft. As a matter of fact, Burma's immediate neighborhood is rife with anti-corruption initiatives these days. Some of the most interesting come from India, where activists are bringing the power of the Internet to bear on petty bribery and official malfeasance. So there can be little talk of corruption-fighting as a quirk of alien Western culture. Nowadays, it would seem, many Asians are becoming obsessed with combating graft. What's more, these efforts demonstrate that combating corruption is not predestined by culture or history. Culturally speaking, Hong Kong and Singapore, both former British colonies, should be just as corrupt as other former British colonies like India and Burma. The difference is that Hong Kong and Singapore found the political will to tackle the problem. Burma's leaders can do the same.

Still, I doubt that the present government is likely to undertake serious measures in this direction any time soon; too many of its members remain compromised by their own dirty dealings. But if the government fails to respond to opposition demands for a true anti-corruption policy, voters will have little reason to reward it for doing so in the next general election three years from now. The powers-that-be reject the principle of clean government at their own risk.

What's more, Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD should practice what they preach. She should announce a policy of zero tolerance among her own followers, including the full and transparent disclosure of assets. As the recent experience of the African National Congress so vividly illustrates, the popular freedom fighters of yesterday can easily morph into the sleazeballs of today once they achieve real power. Starting with the right policies now can help to stave off temptation in the future.